The Infamous Botter of Mercury! (DRAMA FRIENDLY!)
#41
Posted 31 January 2007 - 03:26 AM
#42
Posted 31 January 2007 - 03:26 AM
#43
Posted 31 January 2007 - 03:31 AM
#44
Posted 31 January 2007 - 03:37 AM
P.S. isnt Cutenikki spelled with only 1 k not 2?
P. P. S. No it was more of 14 peeps @ KB and 7 members @ Niddy, honestly we dont have at all that many members. Most of our average Dynamis Attendence is in the 20s and our HNM Alliances are never full. I really dont get were all these ideas of zerg come from but eh it's their so why question it? its going to happen and peeps will always use it cause they got not much else, cept maybe this now i guess o well will see
#45
Posted 31 January 2007 - 03:44 AM
#46
Posted 31 January 2007 - 03:48 AM
#47
Posted 31 January 2007 - 03:53 AM
Anyone from the audience want a beer? Man its about time some pissed of ex-Merc member do something like this XD
#48
Posted 31 January 2007 - 04:04 AM
That part about liking friends that bot is hilarious, of course he is gonna like you, so will the newb mercx members who think gear is gonna suddenly make them a good player, you are cheating under dilias command to get him a defending ring after all the ABJ you already botted for him. Nice friendship, I can see Dilias wasnt dumb enough to use his own character to do it, good thing cutenikki the pawn is around!! I hope you got a pair of gaiters banned, lol!
#49
Posted 31 January 2007 - 04:11 AM
#50
Posted 31 January 2007 - 04:22 AM
If im not mistaken I do believe that this sorta post was made not to long ago by a old former PJ member that said that their were botters in PJ. If anyone could post that post here would be much appreciated.
Timmy I just honestly think you like to stir stuff up I mean...
http://www.killingif...=posts&q=144768
Just seems like a rant for attention but I guess I am feeding that so I suppose im partially at fault here.
#51
Posted 31 January 2007 - 04:23 AM
But screw the sig, back to the drama at hand!
#52
Posted 31 January 2007 - 05:14 AM
About the whole refering to guilty vs. innocent thing
If im not mistaken I do believe that this sorta post was made not to long ago by a old former PJ member that said that their were botters in PJ. If anyone could post that post here would be much appreciated.
Timmy I just honestly think you like to stir stuff up I mean...
http://www.killingif...=posts&q=144768
Just seems like a rant for attention but I guess I am feeding that so I suppose im partially at fault here.
I don't believe a word you've said. Regarding the anon posting, when someone posts under a name other than their in game handle it seems to be because they don't want anyone to know who they are. That's pretty obvious, wouldn't you say? My guess, is that you are someone directly involved with this whole botting issue whether it be Niki, some other leader of ZergX or perhaps even Dilias himself! You wouldn't be putting this much effort into defending something that is made so blatantly obvious by Gosai's screenshots unless that were the case. You don't get banned unless you're doing something wrong and if you claim you're not doing anything wrong then you're full of shit. Give it up, the evidence against the leaders in your linkshell is so airtight you're just wasting your breath. Just try to come up with some smartass comment to what I just said.
Gosai, how many linkshells have you been kicked out of now??!! You fucking banana.
#53
Posted 31 January 2007 - 08:29 AM
Applebill: for shame. You posting your defense anonymously is like me going into a job interview wearing a rubber Halloween mask; it strips anything that is said of any validity and makes it very hard to take seriously. How can you listen to the message when the bearer's credibility is questionable, at best?
I regard anon posters with the same contempt normally reserved for gilsellers and botters. If you're going to say something, have the stones to do it under your own name, or don't say it.
#54
Posted 31 January 2007 - 08:34 AM
This thread so funny... hypocrisy at it's greatest. When Temp got booted from PJs, he washed out all their dirty laundry onto KI, now Gos. Accusations are accusations. Just like the JP thread about Dilias and I botting and apparently both of us been banned from different characters also. Which O find it funny because this has been my only character and yet I am still around. As for Timo and Aviator, you two bitchass botters can deny it all you want, but if you can take Gosai's post to account, so that means we can take Tempality's post as pure evidance.
For gos, I hate to see people leave on bad terms, but people leave on whatever term they choose.
#55
Posted 31 January 2007 - 08:52 AM
Here's why:
( thanks for the pure Gold Dilias
)Accusations and admitting. Theres a difference.
#56
Posted 31 January 2007 - 09:15 AM
#57
Posted 31 January 2007 - 09:28 AM
What does that prove?
What does that accomplish?
Absolutely nothing!
OMG ... an ex-ls member posted bad stuff about the LS. I think we should give up camping and disband our LS. You make it seem like this thread is going to change the world, but in reality, it changes nothing except accusations are still accusations.
Also, if that is called admitting, wouldn't that have to be Niki saying it? Since he is the accused?
OR is Dilias being accused of botting to? Or wait, the whole LS is botting?
More accusations, less answers.
#58
Posted 31 January 2007 - 09:35 AM
LOL
This thread so funny... hypocrisy at it's greatest. When Temp got booted from PJs, he washed out all their dirty laundry onto KI, now Gos. Accusations are accusations. Just like the JP thread about Dilias and I botting and apparently both of us been banned from different characters also. Which O find it funny because this has been my only character and yet I am still around. As for Timo and Aviator, you two bitchass botters can deny it all you want, but if you can take Gosai's post to account, so that means we can take Tempality's post as pure evidance.
For gos, I hate to see people leave on bad terms, but people leave on whatever term they choose.
Are you kidding me? I come on this forum to see how Mercury defends itself and thats the best you can do? An anon poster who "has his reasons" for not showing his name. No shit, I would be ashamed too. Anyways Chopstix likes to start off his post with a big LOL, where will this lead? He was accused of botting in the past! Well, I would say this, I don't think Chopstix and Dilias would bot. The point is they get so many members they could find people so disperate for gear that they would be willing to do such things. (I.e. Niki) So why would Chopstix bot when they can have mules or bought characters doing it for them? Hmm, so whats Chopstix next course of action. Does he try to discredit Gosai? Nope. He goes right for the Timo and Aviator, well since you came up with this evidence! Well... You "Bitchass botters", good come back interesting choice of words if i do say so myself. So in conclusion, Chopstix you didn't prove anything, you just tried to start the point the finger game. Get Dilias on here and explain his linkshell's future. If he refuses to do such a thing, then all the linkshells should take "action". Just call GMs on them at every HNM, over 150 people doing it submiting Mercury's name for them to watch. The more names they get the closer they watch that linkshell. It will only be a matter of time... But anyways this all could be a misunderstanding >.> I want to hear it from Dilias' mouth and to defend himself against Gosai's post. *Goes to get a bag of popcorn*
#59
Posted 31 January 2007 - 09:36 AM
For gos, I hate to see people leave on bad terms, but people leave on whatever term they choose.
So, by leaving you mean that someone logged onto his character and his pearl was broken while he wasn't even there?
Admitting what?
What does that prove?
What does that accomplish?
Absolutely nothing!
OMG ... an ex-ls member posted bad stuff about the LS. I think we should give up camping and disband our LS. You make it seem like this thread is going to change the world, but in reality, it changes nothing except accusations are still accusations.
Also, if that is called admitting, wouldn't that have to be Niki saying it? Since he is the accused?
OR is Dilias being accused of botting to? Or wait, the whole LS is botting?
More accusations, less answers.
I can't help but notice that the majority of Mercury members are dancing around the subject and manipulating every word they can just to make it seem like Gosai is just being spiteful and fabricating everything.
#60
Posted 31 January 2007 - 09:40 AM
Note to Dilias quote. Using a windower also risk your character, and i dont know if its easier detectable if you run 3 chars at 1 pc at once.
I'm not applebill and beside throwing a short eye on this thread in this morning i just read it completely for the first time. I was suprised Gosai didnt post earlier but nobody prolly told him before.
I can understand your frustration Gosai, i would be mad too when i get kicked from the LS if i was a member from for about 2 years. But it was time for you to leave, and i gave yourself 2 days time to do so. I gave you a chance to leave in peace.
You didnt get kicked for saying in LS chat that i would have an alert bot at Tiamat. You got kicked because you say that knowing it's not true.
Thats Gosai's mule since i already had him blisted on his main Char.
Seriously, why would we have kicked you if you say a fact? An alert bot would be known by the LS, nobody would understand why you get kicked. But you were talking trash because you were mad, and like always when you mad, you cant controll yourself and say things you are sorry for afterwards. We gave you 3 warnings, always gave you a new chance when you promise you would behave next time. Even this time, Dilias felt sorry for kicking you and said its limited for 1 week until you will get your pearl again if you apologize to the LS and promise you will try to behave.
At this point i have to say thank you. Thank you for this post, thank you for making it sure that you wont get your pearl back and we don't have to deal with your crazy temper anymore. Most of the LS were tired of your insultings and your weekly "I'm sorry for XYZ" post on our forums. If it was my decision only you would have been kicked from the LS months ago, it was only Dilias believing in you that you could change that allowed you to stay in Mercury.
Everyone knew that he gonna post here, but we decided its more helpful for the peace of the LS to kick you and to deal with your trash talking on KI.
To everyone who thinks that he speaking the truth, why would we have kicked him then? If he had any proofs wouldnt it be easier for us to let him stay? Of course it would be better for us to keep this down, but we have nothing we need to hide, thats why decided to do it this way.
I can understand that you try to get rid of your anger (sp?) by posting here, i prolly would have done the same if you kicked me, but your lies got you kicked out from the LS, and your lies made it sure that you never gonna get back in.
Maybe you should start saying the truth for once.
@Timogay It seems you have problems with your own language. Even IF i would have an alert bot, it doesn't mean PJ (or w/e your new name for your RMT LS is) dont use claim bots. Also what is the 2nd char your talking about? Already funny you talk about 1, but which is the 2nd?
PS: I apologize for the way you got kicked, it sure wasnt the nice way but the only chance to make sure to remove the pearl on all your mule aswell.
I hope for you that you will find a LS that can deal better with your crazy temper than Mercury did, you were a good red mage but you really need to learn to controll yourself.
Similar Topics
| Topic | Forum | Started By | Stats | Last Post Info | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Fun, excitement, drama?
|
Bismarck |
Jaybar
|
|
|
|
Funniest HNM Drama Ever!
Funniest HNM Drama Ever! |
Unicorn |
Eriaxa
|
|
|
|
Alexanderdrama.org is now www.RPGPro.com
|
Alexander |
sigpimud
|
|
|
|
|
Asura |
splynk
|
|
|
|
AzureusSky: a fresh start for a (Sky/Sea) LS
Please take a look if you're looking for a friendly LS |
Asura |
Nilheim
|
|
Sign In
Register
Help

Back to top
MultiQuote




