did you get my pm>.>
Which would you rather have: Zenith Mitts +1 or Morrigan's Cuffs
#182
Posted 17 November 2007 - 12:43 PM
no idea why you would think Toth is an asshole man, he's a great guy. Known him for a long ass time and he's always been decent when im around anyway.
Rambus >>> You win 5 internet's !!! Your posts totally made my morning.
Thanks for the thread guys , it was a rollercoaster ride but not too bad all in all.:love
Rambus >>> You win 5 internet's !!! Your posts totally made my morning.
Thanks for the thread guys , it was a rollercoaster ride but not too bad all in all.:love
#183
Posted 17 July 2009 - 08:49 PM
I finnaly got my Valkyrie Trews today
Full merits
Nakid w/Staff
Freeze II
Valkyrie Trews = 1498
Morrigan's Slops = 1488
Full merits
Nakid w/Staff
Freeze II
Valkyrie Trews = 1498
Morrigan's Slops = 1488
#184
Posted 17 July 2009 - 09:18 PM
did you test that only one time? and on what mobs lol?
#185
Posted 17 July 2009 - 11:42 PM
yes 1 nuke, cuase I am waiting for that new helm to come out to do more tests with full gears.
This is just to say that valk is > then morri for full max dmg, Tier 4 and so forth is different and I will test like I siad once that new helm is out.
This is just to say that valk is > then morri for full max dmg, Tier 4 and so forth is different and I will test like I siad once that new helm is out.
#186
Posted 18 July 2009 - 03:48 AM
QUOTE (nugzkraka @ Jul 18 2009, 06:42 AM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}>
yes 1 nuke, cuase I am waiting for that new helm to come out to do more tests with full gears.
This is just to say that valk is > then morri for full max dmg, Tier 4 and so forth is different and I will test like I siad once that new helm is out.
This is just to say that valk is > then morri for full max dmg, Tier 4 and so forth is different and I will test like I siad once that new helm is out.
When you are fully geared Valk will not out damage morrigan slops on virtually everything.
#187
Posted 18 July 2009 - 10:02 AM
Why the hell was this retarded thread necro'd just to say something pointless?
#188
Posted 18 July 2009 - 03:17 PM
Why is this topic back from the dead? I don't wanna have to read K1nesis' trash again...
#189
Posted 18 July 2009 - 03:41 PM
because the person that bumbed this is like the OP as far as intelligence?:
seriously?
case and point ^
because I do not feel like doing it from scrash:
the bold is best mix set so all i have to do is take out 10 int and insurt 5 mab:
[((84+37)-89)*2+541]*1.15*1.90*1.25 = 1650
kindly... go die, I told you before you where a bit wrong about stuff you said regarding this gear in question, looks like you ingored me and wasted a ton of time/ gil / resources. you are anther example of "I want to lot whore gear without knowledge of knowing about gear / job". same as OP witch enforces what I said you are no better then OP
how this concept applies to a different job that has a weaker MAB trait:
http://ffxigear.com/?ref=12524#
[((82+33)-89)*2+541]*1.15*1.10*1.25*1.20*1.54=1729
I really need to know, with all the time i bash 5 MAB vs 10 INT why do you try to say so otherwise? you present a non-existent (practicality) situation where everyone knows that 5 MAB does better.
why "test" when i can tell you the damage beforehand?
here is some other situations where 5 MAB > 10 INT
Bio II
any cap tair I spell ( dont work well if the mob has 110 int lolimps)
Ga III
I'm not to sure how level II, III spells play though , the card i can play with this is the fact I do not care and use the slandered nuke anyway. the game reasoning i can play is for simmlaur damage I will take the the set I trust that would give me less resists ( INT).
I rarely use GA III, i use II , III spells in a hate limmiter to do some damage so in that respect i would though a bit more enmity anyways ( really mah body is a great piece to have for any completest BLM, do not underestimate it.)
AMII:
[((84+47)-89)*2+710]*1.15*1.85*1.25 = 2111
[((84+37)-89)*2+710]*1.15*1.90*1.25 = 2113
[((84+44)-89)*2+710]*1.15*1.87*1.25=2117
http://ffxigear.com/?ref=15159
[((84+34)-89)*2+710]*1.15*1.92*1.25=2118
WOW! wasting the new head and getting valk tues gives you 1 WHOLE point of damage more on AM II on puddings over full mori set!
*gives potency merits so this would be for burst II
freeze II:
[((84+52)-89)*2+710]*1.15*1.85*1.25 = 2136
[((84+42)-89)*2+710]*1.15*1.90*1.25 = 2138
QUOTE (nugzkraka @ May 10 2009, 03:17 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}>
Non-Elemental Day Nuking Set

Elemental Day Nuking Set

INT/ELE/MAC Balanced Nuking Set for Most HNM

Enfeebling Set

Drain/Aspir Set

Stun Set

Kiting/Standing Set

Stoneskin Set

HMP


Elemental Day Nuking Set

INT/ELE/MAC Balanced Nuking Set for Most HNM

Enfeebling Set

Drain/Aspir Set

Stun Set

Kiting/Standing Set

Stoneskin Set

HMP

QUOTE (Rikkitikkitavi @ May 11 2009, 03:44 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}>
Nugzkraka is the King of BLMS, dont question his choices.
<3
<3
seriously?
QUOTE (thedude24 @ Jul 18 2009, 10:48 AM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}>
When you are fully geared Valk will not out damage morrigan slops on virtually everything.
case and point ^
because I do not feel like doing it from scrash:
QUOTE (rambus @ Jul 1 2009, 02:37 AM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}>
INT 7 head/ my mix argument:
http://ffxigear.com/?ref=12520
[((84+47)-89)*2+541]*1.15*1.85*1.25 = 1660
http://ffxigear.com/?ref=12470
morr set:
[((84+44)-89)*2+541]*1.15*1.87*1.25=1661
http://ffxigear.com/?ref=12519
http://ffxigear.com/?ref=12520
[((84+47)-89)*2+541]*1.15*1.85*1.25 = 1660
http://ffxigear.com/?ref=12470
morr set:
[((84+44)-89)*2+541]*1.15*1.87*1.25=1661
http://ffxigear.com/?ref=12519
the bold is best mix set so all i have to do is take out 10 int and insurt 5 mab:
[((84+37)-89)*2+541]*1.15*1.90*1.25 = 1650
kindly... go die, I told you before you where a bit wrong about stuff you said regarding this gear in question, looks like you ingored me and wasted a ton of time/ gil / resources. you are anther example of "I want to lot whore gear without knowledge of knowing about gear / job". same as OP witch enforces what I said you are no better then OP
how this concept applies to a different job that has a weaker MAB trait:
QUOTE (rambus @ Jul 1 2009, 05:51 AM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}>
mrga/ int4 mab 2 head/ 5 mab hand:
http://ffxigear.com/?ref=12522#
[((82+33)-89)*2+541]*1.15*1.10*1.25*1.20*1.57=1763
mrga/ int 7 head/ 5 mab hand:
http://ffxigear.com/?ref=12522
[((82+36)-89)*2+541]*1.15*1.10*1.25*1.20*1.55=1757
int 11/ int4 mab 2 head/ 5 mab hand
http://ffxigear.com/?ref=12524
[((82+44)-89)*2+541]*1.15*1.10*1.25*1.20*1.49=1735
int 11/ int 7 / 5 mab hand
http://ffxigear.com/?ref=12526
[((82+47)-89)*2+541]*1.15*1.10*1.25*1.20*1.47=1730
gives you an idea of each personally i prob want int 6 for INT resist build attments ( i/e getting 150 for kirin)
but this gives you an idea with gear posted. i thought 4 int / 2 mab be better appealing for sch then blm.
do not do magical hit rate unless you plan on getting a few epeen SS and dropping it for something better.
http://ffxigear.com/?ref=12522#
[((82+33)-89)*2+541]*1.15*1.10*1.25*1.20*1.57=1763
mrga/ int 7 head/ 5 mab hand:
http://ffxigear.com/?ref=12522
[((82+36)-89)*2+541]*1.15*1.10*1.25*1.20*1.55=1757
int 11/ int4 mab 2 head/ 5 mab hand
http://ffxigear.com/?ref=12524
[((82+44)-89)*2+541]*1.15*1.10*1.25*1.20*1.49=1735
int 11/ int 7 / 5 mab hand
http://ffxigear.com/?ref=12526
[((82+47)-89)*2+541]*1.15*1.10*1.25*1.20*1.47=1730
gives you an idea of each personally i prob want int 6 for INT resist build attments ( i/e getting 150 for kirin)
but this gives you an idea with gear posted. i thought 4 int / 2 mab be better appealing for sch then blm.
do not do magical hit rate unless you plan on getting a few epeen SS and dropping it for something better.
http://ffxigear.com/?ref=12524#
[((82+33)-89)*2+541]*1.15*1.10*1.25*1.20*1.54=1729
I really need to know, with all the time i bash 5 MAB vs 10 INT why do you try to say so otherwise? you present a non-existent (practicality) situation where everyone knows that 5 MAB does better.
why "test" when i can tell you the damage beforehand?
here is some other situations where 5 MAB > 10 INT
Bio II
any cap tair I spell ( dont work well if the mob has 110 int lolimps)
Ga III
I'm not to sure how level II, III spells play though , the card i can play with this is the fact I do not care and use the slandered nuke anyway. the game reasoning i can play is for simmlaur damage I will take the the set I trust that would give me less resists ( INT).
I rarely use GA III, i use II , III spells in a hate limmiter to do some damage so in that respect i would though a bit more enmity anyways ( really mah body is a great piece to have for any completest BLM, do not underestimate it.)
AMII:
[((84+47)-89)*2+710]*1.15*1.85*1.25 = 2111
[((84+37)-89)*2+710]*1.15*1.90*1.25 = 2113
[((84+44)-89)*2+710]*1.15*1.87*1.25=2117
http://ffxigear.com/?ref=15159
[((84+34)-89)*2+710]*1.15*1.92*1.25=2118
WOW! wasting the new head and getting valk tues gives you 1 WHOLE point of damage more on AM II on puddings over full mori set!
*gives potency merits so this would be for burst II
freeze II:
[((84+52)-89)*2+710]*1.15*1.85*1.25 = 2136
[((84+42)-89)*2+710]*1.15*1.90*1.25 = 2138
Share this topic:
Similar Topics
| Topic | Forum | Started By | Stats | Last Post Info | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Which Servers Still PvP?
|
Player VS Player |
-TBMC-
|
|
|
|
Anyone have any new Vids?
|
Player VS Player |
Noble
|
|
|
|
Old player coming back
Which server is best? |
FFXI General Information |
Krii
|
|
|
|
What would bring you back to FFXIV?
|
FFXIV General Information |
Hackysacky
|
|
|
|
Do you have this problem too?
|
FFXI General Information |
chrisdenzingigo
|
|
Sign In »
Register Now!
Help




Back to top













