Go.
Somewhere else.
With this sheer stupidity.
gorgets. I know this has went over 1000 times
#62
Posted 04 April 2009 - 06:01 PM
QUOTE (nefarious.lover @ Apr 5 2009, 12:46 AM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}>
Go.
Somewhere else.
With this sheer stupidity.
Somewhere else.
With this sheer stupidity.
Fucking THANK YOU
#63
Posted 04 April 2009 - 06:27 PM
QUOTE (pathwriter @ Apr 4 2009, 04:52 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}>
And, yes, it is being self-important, same as I'm being here. I'm not saying that you're wrong, but I'm not wrong here, either.
Rambus, I don't need to be nice to be right. I wish people would get over that.
Rambus, I don't need to be nice to be right. I wish people would get over that.
As I said, if that is a self-important attitude, I don't apologize.
You don't have to be nice to be correct, but it doesn't hurt anything. You also don't have to be blatantly out of line to be correct. What I had said was I had noticed that more than anything. Few of the post I had noticed were coupled with information that added to the topic at hand.
rambus, thank you for that comment.
#64
Posted 04 April 2009 - 06:58 PM
Look closer at what I do around here, then.
By which I do not really mean the Thief forum, but feel free to peruse page one of this topic just for the sake of argument. The Thief forum thrives on being unhelpful, mean, and egocentric, so I'm really not detracting from the mood by doing this.
By which I do not really mean the Thief forum, but feel free to peruse page one of this topic just for the sake of argument. The Thief forum thrives on being unhelpful, mean, and egocentric, so I'm really not detracting from the mood by doing this.
#65
Posted 04 April 2009 - 10:13 PM
And after all that explanation of his dumb ass question...
OH GODDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDD
Why do you even care enough to inquire about why he got a particular gorget? That has nothing to do with your initial question (that was already answered.) SO FUCKING WHAT?!
QUOTE (rambus @ Apr 3 2009, 08:33 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}>
I never said it didn't
OH GODDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDD
Why do you even care enough to inquire about why he got a particular gorget? That has nothing to do with your initial question (that was already answered.) SO FUCKING WHAT?!
#66
Posted 05 April 2009 - 01:30 AM
QUOTE (Banggugyangu @ Apr 4 2009, 07:27 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}>
As I said, if that is a self-important attitude, I don't apologize.
You don't have to be nice to be correct, but it doesn't hurt anything. You also don't have to be blatantly out of line to be correct. What I had said was I had noticed that more than anything. Few of the post I had noticed were coupled with information that added to the topic at hand.
rambus, thank you for that comment.
You don't have to be nice to be correct, but it doesn't hurt anything. You also don't have to be blatantly out of line to be correct. What I had said was I had noticed that more than anything. Few of the post I had noticed were coupled with information that added to the topic at hand.
rambus, thank you for that comment.
QUOTE (pathwriter @ Apr 4 2009, 07:58 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}>
Look closer at what I do around here, then.
By which I do not really mean the Thief forum, but feel free to peruse page one of this topic just for the sake of argument. The Thief forum thrives on being unhelpful, mean, and egocentric, so I'm really not detracting from the mood by doing this.
By which I do not really mean the Thief forum, but feel free to peruse page one of this topic just for the sake of argument. The Thief forum thrives on being unhelpful, mean, and egocentric, so I'm really not detracting from the mood by doing this.
QUOTE (nefarious.lover @ Apr 4 2009, 06:46 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}>
Go.
Somewhere else.
With this sheer stupidity.
Somewhere else.
With this sheer stupidity.
Seriously.
For the most part we stick to things vaguely in the realm of FFXI and THF in our petty quibbles.
This is just painfully pedantic and trite.
#67
Posted 05 April 2009 - 01:42 AM
QUOTE (Melos @ Apr 5 2009, 05:13 AM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}>
And after all that explanation of his dumb ass question...
OH GODDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDD
Why do you even care enough to inquire about why he got a particular gorget? That has nothing to do with your initial question (that was already answered.) SO FUCKING WHAT?!
OH GODDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDD
Why do you even care enough to inquire about why he got a particular gorget? That has nothing to do with your initial question (that was already answered.) SO FUCKING WHAT?!
nop still confused avacting to derail this thread makes me question if any of it was true, so i made a BG thread.
because i wanted to know to try make sence of things?
#68
Posted 05 April 2009 - 07:42 AM
QUOTE (rambus @ Apr 5 2009, 02:42 AM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}>
nop still confused avacting to derail this thread makes me question if any of it was true, so i made a BG thread.
because i wanted to know to try make sence of things?
because i wanted to know to try make sence of things?
the info you should have ascertained is: If you have Love torque, use it. If you don't, gorgets are good.
#69
Posted 05 April 2009 - 08:32 AM
I like it how two AMERICANS are bitching about ENGLISH.
The colour grey is not the color gray.
This whole fustain argument is otoise, and the greater proportion of it involves formicating oligophrenics and their recusant approach to the English Language.
Language is for getting your point across, nothing more.
The only things that annoy me are their instead of they're and other similar mistakes that are faaaaar too common on the internet.
The colour grey is not the color gray.
This whole fustain argument is otoise, and the greater proportion of it involves formicating oligophrenics and their recusant approach to the English Language.
Language is for getting your point across, nothing more.
The only things that annoy me are their instead of they're and other similar mistakes that are faaaaar too common on the internet.
#70
Posted 05 April 2009 - 09:05 AM
QUOTE (Banggugyangu @ Apr 5 2009, 01:42 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}>
the info you should have ascertained is: If you have Love torque, use it. If you don't, gorgets are good.
forgot the seconday question atm i noyl can use it for evis. because of this in exp pt, merit is it better for me to use then DE.
#71
Posted 05 April 2009 - 12:39 PM
QUOTE (rambus @ Apr 5 2009, 10:05 AM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}>
forgot the seconday question atm i noyl can use it for evis. because of this in exp pt, merit is it better for me to use then DE.
treelo had a great post about evisceration vs DE. Basically, if you have the right gear to cap your crit rate + X's knife, evisceration will easily do more damage over the course of a meripo than DE will. If you don't have the X's knife, then they'll be close, but DE should pull ahead slightly. If you don't have the proper gear for evisceration, then you're probably better off sticking w/ DE.
#72
Posted 05 April 2009 - 04:41 PM
QUOTE
The Thief forum thrives on being unhelpful, mean, and egocentric, so I'm really not detracting from the mood by doing this.
Not true, mostly we're a helpful bunch, as you can see from this thread if you remove all the pointless bickering between you two. A select few decide to be helpful with a negative slant on their advice, generally if you don't ask a question that is already common knowledge, or hasn't been explained recently, you'll get the answer you're looking for.
#73
Posted 28 April 2009 - 02:53 AM
now I have DEX 122 with X's Knife
what about Kubira Bead Necklace VS Gorget which is better for Evis?
thx
what about Kubira Bead Necklace VS Gorget which is better for Evis?
thx
#74
Posted 28 April 2009 - 07:08 AM
QUOTE
what about Kubira Bead Necklace VS Gorget which is better for Evis?
For all extensive purposes the points of an ellipse are round!
Gorget is +.1 fTP.
Evisceration's base fTP is always 1.
That is a 10% improvement.
Adding 4 dex to weapon + fSTR + 122dex isn't going to be as big an improvement.
If your acc isn't capped then gorget wins by a lot on the off hits.
Even if your acc is capped the +2atk on offhits won't make up the difference of the first hit.
P.S. no love torque, right?
P.P.S.
QUOTE
The only things that annoy me are their instead of they're and other similar mistakes that are faaaaar too common on the internet.
I'd agree that they're an eyesore, but it's only a problem when its unclear they made a mistake.
I know the difference between their and they're.
But affect and effect have completely blended into a single meaning for me. =_=
#75
Posted 28 April 2009 - 07:22 AM
QUOTE (Gyth @ Apr 28 2009, 09:08 AM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}>
Gorget is +.1 fTP.
Evisceration's base fTP is always 1.
That is a 10% improvement.
Adding 4 dex to weapon + fSTR + 122dex isn't going to be as big an improvement.
Evisceration's base fTP is always 1.
That is a 10% improvement.
Adding 4 dex to weapon + fSTR + 122dex isn't going to be as big an improvement.
Are you sure of that? I'm not a Thief, so bear in mind that I'm seriously asking this question. The "10% improvement" is only to the first strike, which is obviously also the one that gets all the DEX/AGI of SA/TA dumped into it. 4 STR and 4 DEX doesn't seem totally unfeasible as a substitute for a measly .1x Damage on a weaponskill whose first strike is going to critical, but perhaps I'm misunderstanding the multiplication of the damage equation.
The point about Accuracy is a good one, though.
#76
Posted 28 April 2009 - 07:57 AM
QUOTE
4 STR and 4 DEX doesn't seem totally unfeasible as a substitute for a measly .1x Damage on a weaponskill whose first strike is going to critical
WD = ( D + fSTR + WSC) * fTP + DEX
D=34 for X's
fSTR would depend on mob, 4str may or may not increase this by 1, caps at 11 for X's
WSC=36 with gorget and 37 with beads (or is this scaled lower as well?)
fTP=1.1 with gorget and 1.0 with beads
DEX=122 with gorget and 126 with beads (but thats only here if stacking SA)
(34 + 0 + 36)* 1.1 + 122 = 199
(34 + 1 + 37)* 1.0 + 126 = 198
So its closer than I was expecting, if I even did that all right.
I was thinking the DEX was getting multiplied by the 1.1 as well, which would have boosted the gorget by another 12.
Share this topic:
Similar Topics
| Topic | Forum | Started By | Stats | Last Post Info | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
11] Announcing Coverage of VanaFest 2012!
|
Final Fantasy Front Page News |
Cactuar
|
|
|
|
Facade will bend you all over.
|
Cerberus |
Fyzl
|
|
|
|
Let's play videos or story summary
I wanna know what happens! |
FFXI General Information |
Kiaraa
|
|
|
|
Linkshell for the bored, new, returning, and ones that are starting over AGAIN bc its like crack...
|
Asura |
AnotherFF
|
|
|
|
Should i join this server?
|
Phoenix |
Kerra09
|
|
Sign In »
Register Now!
Help




Back to top
















