[Hitoseijuro]

Why would you not prefer running out of AoE range >_> not like it's harder than pushing a macro or anything.

No idea ppl just like doing things the harder way. Even when they have an Aegis/Dring/odin......

[AsDraBael]

I always carry my MDB set with me because you never know when you're going to maybe eat an attack thats going to hurt like a bitch.

Like say you're 8 manning a Khim with 1 stun beside your shield bash and your bash is down and the stunners stun is down and you see you're about to take that fulm to the face. Switch on the set, take massively reduced damage, which it off.

Its rare, but you never know when that kind of thing will happen so I like to be prepared. And yeah, I always run out of range of Ixions moves since its too easy not too. Even his rampant stance is pretty easy once you really get it down.

[Nameless]

No, there is a priority, as point for point MDT reduces more than MDB. Thats why we suggest that you first cap out your MDT gear, and then fill in the other slots with MDB gear.

You didn't read my post completely. I know MDT is better, which I have already illustrated that in the math. (shown that 20 MDB is only 16.7%, while 50% MDT is just 50%, so MDT is better and should be stacked til capped) I was saying that there is no priority on which is calculated first. It is like 5 x 3 x 2 = 5 x 2 x 3 = 30. It doesn't matter which comes first, the 2 or the 3.

I was mainly replying to the first post of the 2nd page, in which he said MDT is taken before MDB, which is not true. Similar to ppl who always ask "which is calculated first, haste or dual wield?", answer is it doesn't matter which is calculated first, but obviously haste is better.

I hope I didn't confuse you even more.

[Hitoseijuro]

You didn't read my post completely. I know MDT is better, which I have already illustrated that in the math. (shown that 20 MDB is only 16.7%, while 50% MDT is just 50%, so MDT is better and should be stacked til capped) I was saying that there is no priority on which is calculated first. It is like 5 x 3 x 2 = 5 x 2 x 3 = 30. It doesn't matter which comes first, the 2 or the 3.

I was mainly replying to the first post of the 2nd page, in which he said MDT is taken before MDB, which is not true. Similar to ppl who always ask "which is calculated first, haste or dual wield?", answer is it doesn't matter which is calculated first, but obviously haste is better.

I hope I didn't confuse you even more.

No, my reading comprehension is working quite well, Im not confused, thank you. The first post of the 2nd page never stated anything about what was calculated first. Sax was replying exactly like I already stated, first you gear up MDT gear, as he stated, first 24-26% depending on the shell you have on, and then you stack on the MDB. I dont see how hard it is to understand this, never did he say, in any of his post how it was calculated.

It seems he was replying to the previous post before him, which was curious about comparing bodies with MDT and MDB, which is why he said, first MTD, then fill in with MDB . . . . .

Switch on the set, take massively reduced damage, which it off.

Yep, I have a macro like that, sadly when I press it, nothing happens .... Ill need to get that satchel one day

[Nameless]

Yea it is my bad for misunderstanding his post.

Similar to how you misunderstood my post the same way thinking that I was implying that MDT and MDB are the same importance, which wasn't exactly what I was trying to say. You probably stopped reading after the "they are the same priority", which I probably should have worded differently and say it is only when doing the math.

It's all good.

[Hitoseijuro]

Yea it is my bad for misunderstanding his post.

Similar to how you misunderstood my post the same way thinking that I was implying that MDT and MDB are the same importance, which wasn't exactly what I was trying to say. You probably stopped reading after the "they are the same priority", which I probably should have worded differently and say it is only when doing the math.

Nope wrong again

I read all your post, my post about priority, was what the thread was talking about, vs your priority on what you were talking about(mathematical priority), and how what you were discussing beared nothing to what was being asked nor discussed. I was just posting what you misinterpreted...

Either way, it still information , someone is bound to ask.

[Greeber]

Nope wrong again

I read all your post, my post about priority, was what the thread was talking about, vs your priority on what you were talking about(mathematical priority), and how what you were discussing beared nothing to what was being asked nor discussed. I was just posting what you misinterpreted...
Either way, it still information , someone is bound to ask.

that comment sounds like something Captian Jack Sparrow would say

[Captainkirk]

probably doesnt exist and looks like poop