[Robert Redford]

Courtesy 9th Vana'diel Census.

Sorry man. :\

Attached File(s)

•  winning.jpg (68.01K)
  Number of downloads: 27

[Arkley]

Giant red capital "rawr", etc

Honestly though, that it even made it that far is just horrible. Be ashamed, all ye with merits in Winning Streak.

[Corrderio]

G1 was more disappointing IMO. WTF @ How many people went 5/5 on Phantom Roll Recast

[Arkley]

Idk, I prefer QD ACC personally but to me PR Recast vs QD ACC is still a coin toss. If your COR's mostly for merits/dynamis/salvage/assault and other events like that, I can see PR Recast being of more use than QD ACC. If you're taking your COR to gods/HNMs/kings or if you solo then QD ACC would probably be the better choice.

[Corrderio]

For the most part I'm only rolling between 2-4 rolls so it doesn't bother me at all.

[Robert Redford]

The merit results were pretty surprising across the board, actually, such as the number of samurai who merit ikishoten...

[Spider-Dan]

WTF @ How many people went 5/5 on Phantom Roll Recast

I did, and I don't regret it one bit.

[Ezekial]

I did, and I don't regret it one bit.

It's almost like you proudly say you're a shitty lazy player.

[Antithesis]

It's almost like you proudly say you're a shitty lazy player.

Quick Draw merits might not be as important to the next person as they might be to you or me. To each their own.

[BunkMonk]

It's almost like you proudly say you're a shitty lazy player.

Why is that? PR recast is not the same thing as Winning Streak. If your only game activity is meriting, then it's probably pretty damn useless. But seriously, have you never been in a situation where you need to switch up a roll quickly, but you're stuck waiting on the bloody timer?

Personally, I went 5/5 on QD accuracy and recast, but I can definitely see the benefit of having a shorter PR timer. When shit hits the fan, or if a situation changes suddenly, it gives you a lot more versatility.