treelo, on 01 January 2010 - 09:32 PM, said:
Oh the sweet, sweet irony.
Yes, it is delicious indeed. But had I actually been butchering it (accent aside) it would have been more so.
treelo, on 01 January 2010 - 09:32 PM, said:
Ah the joys of possibly the greatest scam ever.
You see, the Spanish and Portugese got there long before we did. The Vikings centuries before that. When we finally arrived, fashionably late (a trait passed on to all Americans), it was to set up trade routes. Far from cutting bloody paths through natives as was to follow once we were rather unjustly ousted, we did what we could to cheat and swindle feather-wearing savages out of their goods in the traditional British way. A hundred and fifty years later, the American Revolution takes place, not long after we'd done such a sterling job in removing the French. Eventually, some paper was written on and you "won."
As I recall, the spanish hit South America. I know there were a few gallivanting around the Florida region, but whatever they were doing couldn't have been of real importance compared to "enlightening" the savages of South America. Now that I think about it, they did a piss poor job. As for the vikings they came, they saw, they...left? And landed in Canada mind you. I did pay some small amount of attention during history and geography unlike most of us Yanks, I'm familiar with the time line and relevance.
Now for the fun part. Unjustly ousted? Well, that's a matter of perspective. I'm prone to agree but for one thing...Parliament sent money grubbing penny pinchers over to make the crown a fortune and thought it would be a good idea to tax them extra. NEVER fuck with a greedy man's wallet. I'm thinking it won't be long before our current regime learns this the hard way too. Besides, you can hardly blame such an opportunistic breed of people for taking full advantage of Britain's focus on putting France in it's place, or for that matter France's willingness to snub the crown by helping a band of rebels. For the record, we did try the traditional British methods of dealing with the Savages. After all, we learned from you. Unfortunately the clever bastards finally caught on. Probably the end result of some bleeding heart of French descent letting the cat out of the bag.
treelo, on 01 January 2010 - 09:32 PM, said:
Actually, what really happened was some terribly cunning sod said, "Hang on a jiffy chaps. Lets see where this goes and kick those bloody frogs out of India." Whoever it was, fucking genius. You see, all empires crumble; what the ancients didn't fully understand is that to ensure it continued, it pays off to give the next guy a helping hand. Jump forward another hundred or so years of smugness at having ruined some tea and we find America staunchy defending their "former" masters in two world wars. Not to mention the continued special relationship that stems from America hurling it's military power at a sandpit while a couple of brits stand on the sidelines making some tea.
Please remember, those stars you're all so terribly fond of are only there to blind you to the Union Jack behind them. You really should just accept the truth after all these years.
Hey, we ruined the HELL out of that tea. Ok, seriously now...on a daily basis we kill enough of our own that we don't need the help of Gerries, Japs, or dune coons. In all honesty, they probably couldn't even contend but the point is we don't need them trying. In that vein it only makes sense to jump in while potential threats are steamrolling France or trying to figure out how to assault Britain. Looks like we dropped the ball with the dune coons though...perhaps after a couple hundred years people on the national stage have figured out the bait and switch tactics we've been employing. I blame France.