avatar? best film? REALLY????? FML
wtf @ golden globes
#3
Posted 18 January 2010 - 11:39 AM
Your the only one who gives two shits about the golden globes.
#5
Posted 18 January 2010 - 12:01 PM
#6
Posted 18 January 2010 - 12:04 PM
DONT BE A DOUCHE IM REALLY PISSED OFF ABOUT THIS. WHY AVATAR? SO MANY BETTER FILMS.... FFS I HATE THIS FORUM
#7
Posted 18 January 2010 - 12:33 PM
Your pissed off that a movie won a hollywood circle jerk award?
See the above video
Quote
FFS I HATE THIS FORUM
See the above video
#8
Posted 18 January 2010 - 01:28 PM
No, seriously. Avatar is the new worst blight on the planet. At least Twilight kept people shut in for fear of the sun. Now we have suicidal hippies naming their kids Zot and shit and wanting to kill them to send them to the mystery fairy planet.
If someone tells you they liked Avatar, run away. After shooting them.
~M
If someone tells you they liked Avatar, run away. After shooting them.
~M
#10
Posted 18 January 2010 - 01:50 PM
Seriously? Seriously? We're comparing it to Twilight? Do you even know what you're talking about?
Avatar had fantastic visuals, an interesting world, and a relatively neat sentient species. Granted, the acting and script were marginally terrible, but I've seen hundreds of worse movies. I've read thousands of worse books. Does it deserve the Golden Globe? Fuck no, but does the Golden Globe even mean anything to me? Heh.
Avatar had fantastic visuals, an interesting world, and a relatively neat sentient species. Granted, the acting and script were marginally terrible, but I've seen hundreds of worse movies. I've read thousands of worse books. Does it deserve the Golden Globe? Fuck no, but does the Golden Globe even mean anything to me? Heh.
#11
Posted 18 January 2010 - 01:54 PM
At least the blue fairies didn't sparkle in the sun like the Twilight fairies.
#12
Posted 18 January 2010 - 02:52 PM
The only people who care about these kinds of awards are either in the industry or treat E! like it was a distributor of hard core porn. There totally vapid and self serving.
But i do not want to get in the way of you planing your oscar party. or wondering what kind of shenanigans are going to go on at this years mtv awards.
But i do not want to get in the way of you planing your oscar party. or wondering what kind of shenanigans are going to go on at this years mtv awards.
#14
Posted 18 January 2010 - 03:30 PM
http://www.theregist...2/avatar_blues/
Yes, we are comparing it to Twilight. Because neither group has the guts to commit fucking suicide and leave me alone.
~M
Yes, we are comparing it to Twilight. Because neither group has the guts to commit fucking suicide and leave me alone.
~M
#15
Posted 18 January 2010 - 04:51 PM
ah the if i cant go to a digital world i will kill my self club. that particular band of darwin award winners are just so funny.
#16
Posted 18 January 2010 - 05:07 PM
So we're judging the movie based on how many fans have serious mental issues?
Yeah, because that makes a lot of fucking sense.
Movie makes nearly $2 billion, so we'll assume it's reaching a larger audience. Hey guess what, when you take a larger sample size you get a larger number of screwballs too. Imagine that.
Yeah, because that makes a lot of fucking sense.
Movie makes nearly $2 billion, so we'll assume it's reaching a larger audience. Hey guess what, when you take a larger sample size you get a larger number of screwballs too. Imagine that.
#17
Posted 18 January 2010 - 05:22 PM
if it comes from hollywood, chances are it is polluted by faggots and their faggoty ways
#18
Posted 19 January 2010 - 12:19 AM
Aliadim, on 18 January 2010 - 01:50 PM, said:
Seriously? Seriously? We're comparing it to Twilight? Do you even know what you're talking about?
Terrible writing, terrible acting and very, very overrated. Yeah.... Sounds like Twilight to me.
Just as long as Na'vi doesn't become the new Klingon, I don't really care. The moment they start speaking Na'vi I will start stalking the tards going "HEY LISTEN!" until they do kill themselves, though.
#19
Posted 19 January 2010 - 01:14 AM
.Sotek., on 19 January 2010 - 12:19 AM, said:
Terrible writing, terrible acting and very, very overrated. Yeah.... Sounds like Twilight to me.
All of that is true for plenty of movies in the past. Realize that Twilight is also originally a book series that truly demonstrated everything awful a writer can do. You can say what you want about this movie, but it's no Twilight. Twilight is also a plague on everything it was attempting to write about. At best, this movie represents a relatively average core that got too much attention from the masses (as bad as it was, it's not nearly as bad as you guys make it out to be - it's the same mediocre crap that's been coming out for years, but it's no travesty). Twilight is an example of the worst possible edition to literature that was even more widely accepted.
#20
Posted 19 January 2010 - 02:30 AM
This is a dumb conversation. Every moron on the internet has an opinion on movies like they're kingshit critics or something. Honestly, who gives a damn? Like James Cameron is on the boards wondering how you feel about his movie and whether the writing was up to par with your standards. Most likely you've paid to see it and put money into his supposedly undeserving pockets. And no, I don't care if you watched it online and didn't pay to see it, not my point. And while you're sitting here crying about how lame a movie is, it's making bank and you still suck. As for the comparison to Twilight, I see no real similarities between the two other than the retarded fans getting way too into it. What's your point? This has happened for almost every single movie/tv show/cartoon since god knows how long. How many dorks do you see going to conventions and dressing up as lame ninjas, boba fett, or klingons? Really, trying to pull down something that's popular for no good reason is just dumb. You're not cool, get over yourself.
Sign In »
Register Now!
Help



Back to top

















