[pillanious]

Cap on it with 57+112 mind and scholar sub at level 76 is 678 HP
With 57 + 67 MND it healed 652 HP. Formula according to wikipedia is 3 hp per MND

Both of these were tested with a light staff at 74% waning gibbous

With magic fruit's cap being 640, this is only a very slight increase in the amount we can heal - and requires a fairly high amount of +MND to achieve.

What's everyone else's opinion?

[Aeonknight]

In terms of raw healing, not looking to be much better than fruit. But I'd say the allure of it is gonna be in the attack bonus, since it does work on other melee's. Maybe useful if you're playing a strictly support role like main healer or something, but if you're just solo'ing or DD'ing it up... Fruit still wins.

[fyreus]

Maybe this should be reported so they can fix it alongside Aspir and Aspir II.

[pillanious]

fyreus, on 25 June 2010 - 11:25 AM, said:

Maybe this should be reported so they can fix it alongside Aspir and Aspir II.

What's wrong with aspir?

[Rhayve]

pillanious, on 25 June 2010 - 12:37 PM, said:

What's wrong with aspir?

They're far more potent than it is supposed to be.

This post has been edited by Rhayve: 28 June 2010 - 06:01 AM

[pillanious]

Rhayve, on 25 June 2010 - 01:00 PM, said:

They're far more potent that it is supposed to be.

Are you sure they didn't just raise the cap because of level cap increases?