[rambus]

what does this mean? and i want to take it that bonus is not going to override 3 mab and 5 int for damage, unless there is better then that.

cant keep track of all this new stuff

[Pofo]

As I've been saying for weeks in the Post Pics thread, it occasionally causes your spells to insta-cast, when it procs the recast for the spell is set to 0 so you can recast it imediatly. That being said I have 5/5 on the entire set and it's a horribly low proc rate (7-10%), sometimes it can take me upwards of 20-25 casts to proc it, other times I get lucky and insta-Aero V twice ina row. Best method for testing it is to Put Addendum: White on, and repeatedly cast Reraise II, resting to inturrupt yourself when instacast doesn't proc. The rate does not seem to vary depending on the spells you're casting, but it does stack with Atma of the Apocalypse for roughly a 20% proc rate, 23% if you want to throw on the earring from WotG Reward that has "Occ. Quickens Spellcasting". Imo, getting all of those is too large of a damage decrease to be worthwhile, unless you're fighting something you can outrun that would otherwise be unsoloable without insta-cast. I nuke in Cybele Pants, I sacrifice the small damage difference between Vicious Mufflers for Savant's Bracers +2 just for the extra chances at insta-cast, I wouldn't swap my Cybele pants for my +2 legs however.

[rambus]

Pofo, on 07 January 2011 - 06:06 PM, said:

As I've been saying for weeks in the Post Pics thread, it occasionally causes your spells to insta-cast, when it procs the recast for the spell is set to 0 so you can recast it imediatly. That being said I have 5/5 on the entire set and it's a horribly low proc rate (7-10%), sometimes it can take me upwards of 20-25 casts to proc it, other times I get lucky and insta-Aero V twice ina row. Best method for testing it is to Put Addendum: White on, and repeatedly cast Reraise II, resting to inturrupt yourself when instacast doesn't proc. The rate does not seem to vary depending on the spells you're casting, but it does stack with Atma of the Apocalypse for roughly a 20% proc rate, 23% if you want to throw on the earring from WotG Reward that has "Occ. Quickens Spellcasting". Imo, getting all of those is too large of a damage decrease to be worthwhile, unless you're fighting something you can outrun that would otherwise be unsoloable without insta-cast. I nuke in Cybele Pants, I sacrifice the small damage difference between Vicious Mufflers for Savant's Bracers +2 just for the extra chances at insta-cast, I wouldn't swap my Cybele pants for my +2 legs however.

thanks for the answer, you got any adivce on getting seals? im getting the +2 stuff easier then seals its like no one does them.

[Pofo]

Which Seals in particular? Head, legs and feet are all a joke, usually on my server I always see people shouting for them because noone wants them. Hands I got off the Acrolith NM in Abyssea - Ulegarund, and the body I got off Ironclad Smiter. Ironclad Smiter can either be a SCH's best friend or a cunt, it just depends on hsi mood, the first time I did it, I got 2 sch seals out of about 20 kills... and that discouraged me from getting the body because the quest for SCH body seals is retarded and the seal rate is just as shitty. But I went to help my friend who was making the Empyrian Harpe kill some smiters for the Iron Plates, and he was dropping a SCH Body Seal nearly every kill, he even dropped 2 on the last kill, which free fell because I was already 10/10.

[rambus]

Pofo, on 23 January 2011 - 12:09 PM, said:

Which Seals in particular? Head, legs and feet are all a joke, usually on my server I always see people shouting for them because noone wants them. Hands I got off the Acrolith NM in Abyssea - Ulegarund, and the body I got off Ironclad Smiter. Ironclad Smiter can either be a SCH's best friend or a cunt, it just depends on hsi mood, the first time I did it, I got 2 sch seals out of about 20 kills... and that discouraged me from getting the body because the quest for SCH body seals is retarded and the seal rate is just as shitty. But I went to help my friend who was making the Empyrian Harpe kill some smiters for the Iron Plates, and he was dropping a SCH Body Seal nearly every kill, he even dropped 2 on the last kill, which free fell because I was already 10/10.

really ment any paper, yeserday was the first time i saw the apperaty for something and those papers got me the +2 hands as you see in my other thread i was testing out that bonus and how it stacked with other things. so now i need the other 4 parts. ( even though it was one person for each job then have me and someone else for SCH)

after i got hands I saw a shout for body and we end up having so few people we died to it. he didnt think it be fair for everyone to have 1 person lotting each job then 3 for sch.

I dont even understand why peopel want this SCH stuff, most cant even play the job, hey guz i want tn nuke if full relic armor to make people think sch cant nuke

This post has been edited by rambus: 23 January 2011 - 03:58 PM

[rambus]

I tried doing ironclad again...

this mob is so shitty and im going broke from poping it all it ever drops is damn drk, even if you dont proc it ill drop a drk seal.

then i had one kill that was 3 nin and a drk

[rambus]

does SCH +2 head do anything over +1 besides 3 enchcnbing and some shitty proc rate to a bonus?

[Banter]

rambus, on 28 February 2011 - 09:58 PM, said:

does SCH +2 head do anything over +1 besides 3 enchcnbing and some shitty proc rate to a bonus?

[rambus]

Banter, on 01 March 2011 - 07:38 AM, said:

yay a pointless post.

sorry for this but i relooked what +1 hat was and it was only 25%, so the ebullience increase is really nice, just a shame its useless on normal nukes, same with sch pants.

could of put some mab bonus on the feet and hands too to make up for it but all well.

sch pants are pretty useless for the content of now, really who cares about enfeebling magic skill, magic acc is very lol atm

+1 may be ok but the +1>+2 upgrade is stupid, not really an upgrade

This post has been edited by rambus: 02 March 2011 - 03:37 AM

[.Sotek.]

Is it really so hard?

[Banter]

.Sotek., on 02 March 2011 - 03:51 PM, said:

Is it really so hard?

That's what she said