after
watching a bud of mine soloing w/ his bst at lvl 56 and chain killing vt's / it's i've
been debating leveling up bst, i'm just curious.. why not pick rdm for subjob instead of
whm? you will get better enfeebles, and you still get the cures, just takes a fwe more
levels to get them.
only problem would be no status cures like poisona etc.
Page 1 of 1
bst sub
#3
Posted 10 March 2004 - 04:00 AM
WHM sub
is for getting rid of the status effects really thats about it. And because you don't want
to lose chains the clear mind and divine seal helps a lot. I mean who are you going to draw
hate to.. your imaginary friend?
I could see RDM being a nice sub at level say. 70
for some extreme NM hunting or anything you need since you'll have your cures, and phalanx
/stoneskin.
is for getting rid of the status effects really thats about it. And because you don't want
to lose chains the clear mind and divine seal helps a lot. I mean who are you going to draw
hate to.. your imaginary friend?
I could see RDM being a nice sub at level say. 70
for some extreme NM hunting or anything you need since you'll have your cures, and phalanx
/stoneskin.
#4
Posted 11 March 2004 - 10:30 PM
I always
thought that whm subbed was mostly due to the boost in Charisma, which is pretty important
to the BST class.
thought that whm subbed was mostly due to the boost in Charisma, which is pretty important
to the BST class.
#5
Posted 11 March 2004 - 10:33 PM
it's more
of a factor for the status removals, since you're solo all the time.. or duo w/ another bst
last thing u want is to die like a lvl 2 to a poison
of a factor for the status removals, since you're solo all the time.. or duo w/ another bst
last thing u want is to die like a lvl 2 to a poison
#6
Posted 18 March 2004 - 09:31 PM
I just
started leveling Bst today and the biggest problem I've had is poison. Whm for poisona is
worth it!
started leveling Bst today and the biggest problem I've had is poison. Whm for poisona is
worth it!
Share this topic:
Page 1 of 1
Sign In »
Register Now!
Help



Back to top








